Skip to main content
Version: Next

Scheduling Workloads with Multiple Components

Overview

Many modern distributed applications consist of multiple components with heterogeneous resource requirements. For example, a Flink cluster includes JobManager and TaskManager components, while a Ray cluster comprises Head and Worker nodes. Each component typically has different replica counts and resource specifications.

Starting from Karmada v1.16, the multiple pod templates scheduling feature enables accurate resource-aware scheduling for these complex workloads. This ensures that Karmada correctly understands the total resource requirements of multi-component applications and makes informed scheduling decisions across your member clusters.

Why Multiple Component Scheduling?

Prior to v1.16, Karmada's scheduler assumed all replicas in a workload were identical, using a single pod template to represent resource requirements. This assumption worked well for simple applications like Deployments, but led to inaccuracies with multi-component workloads.

Consider a FlinkDeployment with two components:

  • JobManager: 1 replica requiring 1 CPU and 2Gi memory
  • TaskManager: 3 replicas, each requiring 2 CPU and 4Gi memory

With traditional scheduling, the scheduler could only represent one component's requirements, leading to:

  • Underestimation: Applies JobManager profile to all replicas → Calculates only 4 CPUs total (vs. 7 needed) → Risks scheduling to an insufficient cluster (Pending Pods).
  • Overestimation: Applies TaskManager profile to all replicas → Estimates 8 CPUs total (vs. 7 needed) → Wastes resources and limits cluster selection.
  • Inaccurate quota calculations: FederatedResourceQuota shows incorrect usage.

With multi-component scheduling, the scheduler accurately understands:

  • Total resources needed: (1 × 1 CPU + 1 × 2Gi) + (3 × 2 CPU + 3 × 4Gi) = 7 CPU and 14Gi memory
  • Each component's specific requirements
  • Whether a cluster can accommodate all components together

Supported Workload Types

The multi-component scheduling feature is designed for CRDs with multiple heterogeneous pod templates. Common use cases include:

CategoryExamples
Streaming processingFlink, Kafka Streams, Apache Storm
AI/ML frameworksRay, TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet
ML trainingParameter servers, distributed training jobs
Batch processingSpark, Volcano, Hadoop
Data processingXGBoost, PaddlePaddle, Distributed databases
Distributed systemsElasticsearch, Redis Cluster, Database clusters

Karmada provides built-in interpreter support for popular CRDs. You can find the list of CRDs with built-in interpreter support in the Resource Interpreter documentation. For new CRD types or custom workloads, you can implement a custom interpreter (see Customizing Resource Interpreter) or reach out to the Karmada community for support.

Feature Maturity and Requirements

The multi-component scheduling feature is currently in Alpha stage and available starting from Karmada v1.16. As an alpha feature, it is subject to changes in future releases, but the core scheduling functionality is fully functional and ready for evaluation and testing environments.

To use the multi-component scheduling feature, you must enable the MultiplePodTemplatesScheduling feature gate. This feature gate must be enabled on the following components:

  • karmada-controller-manager: Responsible for interpreting multi-component workload specifications and populating component information in ResourceBinding objects.
  • karmada-scheduler: Responsible for scheduling decisions based on the component resource requirements extracted by the controller.
  • karmada-webhook: Responsible for validating the component information parsed from the resource template.

How It Works

The following diagram shows the process of multi-component scheduling, using FlinkDeployment as an example. The same workflow applies to other multi-component applications such as RayCluster, TensorFlow Clusters, and other distributed systems.

Multi-Component Scheduling Architecture

The diagram above shows the scheduling workflow:

  1. Multi-component applications (e.g., FlinkDeployment, RayCluster) are submitted to the Karmada API Server. A PropagationPolicy or ClusterPropagationPolicy is required to specify how the workload should be distributed across member clusters.

  2. The Karmada controller leverages the Resource Interpreter to parse each component's resource requirements. These requirements are stored in the spec.components field of the ResourceBinding object.

  3. The scheduler evaluates candidate clusters on a per-component basis rather than by total resource sum. For example, it checks whether a cluster can accommodate the JobManager, then whether the same cluster can also accommodate all TaskManagers. This approach better accounts for resource distribution and fragmentation across cluster nodes.

  4. The scheduler selects the cluster that can satisfy all component requirements. All components are then scheduled to that cluster as a single unit.

Limitations and Constraints

Currently, the multi-component scheduling feature has the following limitations:

  • All components of a workload must be scheduled to the same cluster
  • Cross-cluster component distribution is not supported yet

Multi-component workloads often have tight coupling between components (shared storage, network connectivity, synchronization requirements). Distributing components across clusters introduces significant complexity in resource management, failure handling, and performance optimization.

We recognize that distributing components across clusters is a natural evolution to better utilize multi-cluster resources. This approach would enable more flexible resource allocation and improved utilization across your infrastructure. However, supporting this requires:

  • Clear splitting rules and policies defined by users to ensure components are placed appropriately
  • Dependency and affinity specifications to prevent incompatible placements that could result in scheduled but non-functional workloads

We welcome user feedback and use cases for cross-cluster component distribution. If you have specific requirements or scenarios, please don't hesitate to reach out to us.

What's Next