Application-level failover
In the multi-cluster scenario, user workloads may be deployed in multiple clusters to improve service high availability. Karmada already supports multi-cluster failover when detecting a cluster fault. It's a consideration from a cluster perspective. However, some failures of clusters will only affect specific applications. From the perspective of the cluster, it may be necessary to distinguish between affected and unaffected applications. Also, the application may still be unavailable when the control plane of the cluster is in a healthy state. Therefore, Karmada needs to provide a means of fault migration from an application perspective.
Why Application-level Failover is Required
The following describes some scenarios of application-level failover:
- The administrator deploys an application in multiple clusters with preemptive scheduling. When cluster resources are in short supply, low-priority applications that were running normally are preempted and cannot run normally for a long time. At this time, applications cannot self-heal within a cluster. Users wants to try to schedule it to another cluster to ensure that the service is continuously served.
- The administrator use the cloud vendor's spot instance to deploy the application. When users use spot instances to deploy applications, the application may fail to run due to resources being recycled. In this scenario, the amount of resource perceived by the scheduler is the size of the resource quota, not the actual available resources. At this time, users want to schedule the application other than the one that failed previously.
- ....
How Do I Enable the Feature?
When an application migrates from one cluster to another, it needs to ensure that its dependencies are migrated synchronously.
Therefore, you need to ensure that PropagateDeps
feature gate is enabled and propagateDeps: true
is set in the propagation policy. PropagateDeps
feature gate has evolved to Beta since Karmada v1.4 and is enabled by default.
Also, whether the application needs to be migrated depends on the health status of the application. Karmada's Resource Interpreter Framework
is designed for interpreting resource structure. It provides users with
a interpreter operation to tell Karmada how to figure out the health status of a specific object. It's up to users to decide when to reschedule. Before you use the feature, you need to ensure that the interpretHealth
rules for the application is configured.
If you use the purge mode with graceful eviction, GracefulEviction
feature gate should be enabled. GracefulEviction
feature gate has also evolved to Beta since Karmada v1.4 and is enabled by default.
Configure Application Failover
.spec.failover.application
field of PropagationPolicy represents the rules of application failover.
It has three fields to set:
- DecisionConditions
- PurgeMode
- GracePeriodSeconds
Configure Decision Conditions
DecisionConditions
indicates the decision conditions of performing the failover process. Only when all conditions are met can the failover process be performed.
Currently, it includes tolerance time for the application's unhealthy state. It's 300s by default.
PropagationPolicy can be configured as follows:
apiVersion: policy.karmada.io/v1alpha1
kind: PropagationPolicy
metadata:
name: test-propagation
spec:
#...
failover:
application:
decisionConditions:
tolerationSeconds: 300
#...
Configure PurgeMode
PurgeMode
represents represents how to deal with the legacy applications on the cluster from which the application is migrated.
Karmada supports three different purgeMode for eviction:
Immediately
represents that Karmada will immediately evict the legacy application.Graciously
represents that Karmada will wait for the application to come back to healthy on the new cluster or after a timeout is reached before evicting the application. You need to configureGracePeriodSeconds
meanwhile. If the application on the new cluster cannot reach a Healthy state, Karmada will delete the application afterGracePeriodSeconds
is reached. It's 600s by default.Never
represents that Karmada will not evict the application and users manually confirms how to clean up redundant copies.
PropagationPolicy can be configured as follows:
apiVersion: policy.karmada.io/v1alpha1
kind: PropagationPolicy
metadata:
name: test-propagation
spec:
#...
failover:
application:
decisionConditions:
tolerationSeconds: 300
gracePeriodSeconds: 600
purgeMode: Graciously
#...
Or
apiVersion: policy.karmada.io/v1alpha1
kind: PropagationPolicy
metadata:
name: test-propagation
spec:
#...
failover:
application:
decisionConditions:
tolerationSeconds: 300
purgeMode: Never
#...
Example
Assume that you have configured a propagationPolicy:
apiVersion: policy.karmada.io/v1alpha1
kind: PropagationPolicy
metadata:
name: nginx-propagation
spec:
failover:
application:
decisionConditions:
tolerationSeconds: 120
purgeMode: Never
propagateDeps: true # application failover is set, propagateDeps must be true
resourceSelectors:
- apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: nginx
placement:
clusterAffinity:
clusterNames:
- member1
- member2
- member3
spreadConstraints:
- maxGroups: 1
minGroups: 1
spreadByField: cluster
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- image: nginx
name: nginx
Now the application is scheduled into member2 and these two replicas run normally. Now you taint all nodes in member2 and evict the replica to construct the abnormal state of the application.
# mark node "member2-control-plane" as unschedulable in cluster member2
kubectl --context member2 cordon member2-control-plane
# delete the pod in cluster member2
kubectl --context member2 delete pod -l app=nginx
You can immediately find that the deployment is unhealthy now from the ResourceBinding.
#...
status:
aggregatedStatus:
- applied: true
clusterName: member2
health: Unhealthy
status:
availableReplicas: 0
readyReplicas: 0
replicas: 2
After tolerationSeconds is reached, you will find that the deployment in member2 has been evicted and it's re-scheduled to member1.
#...
spec:
clusters:
- name: member1
replicas: 2
gracefulEvictionTasks:
- creationTimestamp: "2023-05-08T09:29:02Z"
fromCluster: member2
producer: resource-binding-application-failover-controller
reason: ApplicationFailure
suppressDeletion: true
You can edit suppressDeletion
to false in gracefulEvictionTasks
to evict the application in the failed cluster after you confirm the failure.
Stateful Application Failover Support
Starting from v1.12, the application-level failover feature adds support for stateful application failover, it provides a generalized way for users to define application state preservation in the context of cluster-to-cluster failovers.
In releases prior to v1.12, Karmada’s scheduling logic runs on the assumption that resources that are scheduled and rescheduled are stateless. In some cases, users may desire to conserve a certain state so that applications can resume from where they left off in the previous cluster. For CRDs dealing with data-processing (such as Flink or Spark), it can be particularly useful to restart applications from a previous checkpoint. That way applications can seamlessly resume processing data while avoiding double processing.
Defining StatePreservation
StatePreservation
is a field under .spec.failover.application
, it defines the policy for preserving and restoring state data during failover events for stateful applications. When an application fails over from one cluster to another, this policy enables the extraction of critical data from the original resource configuration.
It contains a list of StatePreservationRule
configurations. Each rule specifies a JSONPath expression targeting specific pieces of state data to be preserved during failover events. An AliasLabelName
is associated with each rule, serving as a label key when the preserved data is passed to the new cluster. You can define the state preservation policy:
apiVersion: policy.karmada.io/v1alpha1
kind: PropagationPolicy
metadata:
name: example-propagation
spec:
#...
failover:
application:
decisionConditions:
tolerationSeconds: 60
purgeMode: Immediately
statePreservation:
rules:
- aliasLabelName: pre-updated-replicas
jsonPath: "{ .updatedReplicas }"
The above configuration will parse the updatedReplicas
field from the application .status
before migration. Upon successful migration, the extracted data is then re-injected into the new resource, ensuring that the application can resume operation with its previous state intact.
This capability requires enabling the StatefulFailoverInjection
feature gate. StatefulFailoverInjection
is currently in Alpha
and is turned off by default.
There are currently some restrictions on the use of this function, please pay attention when using it:
- Only the scenario where an application is deployed in one cluster and migrated to another cluster is considered.
- If consecutive failovers occur, for example, an application is migrated form clusterA to clusterB and then to clusterC, the PreservedLabelState before the last failover is used for injection. If the PreservedLabelState is empty, the injection is skipped.
- The injection operation is performed only when PurgeMode is set to Immediately.
Application failover is still a work in progress. We are in the progress of gathering use cases. If you are interested in this feature, please feel free to start an enhancement issue to let us know.